Ethics
What I learned from my father
My
experience in the executive recruitment and selection
field is the product of a long process of learning, of
acquiring knowledge, of observing and analyzing economic
and social phenomena, the successive changes registered
in the world economy and, above all, of long years practicing
this profession.
According
to the etymological origin of the term, vocation is a
call to practice a given activity. A certain mental chemistry
is also needed in order to fully develop a service vocation.
One only needs to nourish the chemistry properly for it
to grow.
My
particular case was one of growing up and developing professionally
in the executive recruitment and selection environment.
I owe a great deal of what I presently am to my father,
John E. Smith Jr., one of the most prestigious headhunters
in Mexico and the world over. Foremost among the things
that he taught me were that our work involves one of the
noblest assets in industrial activity: human talent. I
also learned that only the highest of ethical principles
can be involved in managing such an attribute, and that
success is based on confidence, on clear rules and on
the client/recruiter relationship.
Below are several of the foremost aspects of that relationship:
A
search is an extremely personalized activity. The client's
loyalty focuses more on the recruiter than on the organization
per se.
There must be complete abidance by accepted ethical standards,
such as the following:
We
do not compete against our customers
In
our field, the goal is never to see who can find the best
candidate in the shortest amount of time possible. We
are not a sales force selling a product to our customers,
rather an extension of our clients. It is consequently
indispensable and vitally important that we work together
as a team.
We
happily welcome a customer's recommendation relative to
a candidate
At
times we evaluate and recommend a candidate introduced
to us by one of our customers. This circumstance may occasionally
lead a customer to question our retainer and request a
discount. This is quite frankly unacceptable.
The
placement of additional candidates generates payment of
additional retainers.
On
occasion the client decides that it is able to employ
two or more of the candidates introduced, perhaps one
of which will be for an originally unconsidered post.
That second placement will result in an additional fee,
as we do not provide two candidates for the price of one.
When
both parties are acquainted with the same candidates,
a conflict should not be the result.
The
world of executives in Mexico is fairly small. And this
is exactly why both the recruitment consultant and client
may be acquainted with the same people, either from a
past or present experience. What we do at ALSmith y
Asociados in an attempt to offset this situation is
to find out from the client, right from the beginning
of the search, if it has a particular candidate in mind
for us to recommend or exclude from the research and recruitment
phase. In our opinion although the client may have known
a candidate in the past or had contact with him/her, this
is not a reason to question his/her candidacy as a potential
executive presented by our firm. At times, our client
has already met or heard of some of the candidates being
recommended by the firm. Were we to exclude all such candidates
for fear of not being able to charge our retainer, we
might just as well no longer be in the market.
The
nature of our business.
We
offer consulting services specializing in executive recruitment
and selection. Our clients pay us for our time and talent,
for working albeit not necessarily making placements.
In view of the nature of the field per se, our activities
always require a great deal of effort and the best motivation
we can possibly have is the confidence of our clients,
never the threat of a customer's mistrust.